Microbial identification entails the rigorous process of differentiating among various categories of microorganisms—encompassing bacteria, yeasts, and molds—and ascertaining their genus, species, or strain using established classification frameworks. This process involves a detailed characterization of unknown microorganisms based on an analysis of both phenotypic and genotypic traits.
Despite their microscopic size, microorganisms play a pivotal role within ecosystems. They significantly contribute to biodiversity in various environments including soil, water, and air. Additionally, they have profound implications for human health, participating in beneficial processes such as digestion and immune system regulation, while also being implicated in adverse outcomes including infections and diseases. As such, the detection, study, and identification of these microorganisms remain imperative for advancing our understanding of their roles and impacts.
Traditional Methods
Microbial identification traditionally hinges on phenotypic characteristics, including cell morphology, biochemical reactions, and specific growth requirements. Specifically, these methods encompass:
Though effective, these traditional methods can be labor-intensive and time-consuming, necessitating extensive manual effort.
Rapid Identification Techniques
With advancements in technology, rapid identification techniques offer more efficient and precise microbial identification. These methods provide quicker turnaround times and enhanced accuracy. Key techniques include:
N2 Jenomics Lab Pvt. Ltd. provides the following advanced microbial identification services:


In general, the accuracy of species identification improves with longer sequencing reads. However, practical considerations such as sequencing platform capabilities and costs often necessitate a choice of sequencing platform and amplification regions based on the specific objectives of the study.
The workflow of microbial identification at N2 Jenomics Lab Pvt. Ltd. involves several key steps:

Sample Requirements
Note: Sample amounts are listed for reference only. For detailed information, please contact us with your customized requests. | |
| Sequencing Strategy
|
Bioinformatics Analysis
Note: Recommended data outputs and analysis contents displayed are for reference only. For detailed information, please contact us with your customized requests. |

Partial results are shown below:
![]() The taxonomy distribution of all sample in Phylum classification level. | ![]() Species abundance Heatmap. | ![]() Rarefaction curve of the sequenced reads for samples (The above figure) & The depth of the sequencing samples (The below figure). |
![]() Boxplot analysis based on bray Curtis (A), binary jaccard (B), unweighted unifrac (C), and weighted unifrac (D). | ![]() PCoA analysis based on bray Curtis (A), binary jaccard (B), unweighted unifrac (C), and weighted unifrac (D). | ![]() UPGMA clustering tree. |
![]() Mean proportion of treated and control group | ![]() Cladogram. | ![]() LDA SCORE. |
1. How to Select the Appropriate Sequencing Method?
Choosing the correct sequencing method depends on the research goals and sample types involved. For instance, Sanger sequencing is suited for pure cultured strains, metagenomic sequencing is ideal for studying the diversity of complex environmental samples, while whole-genome sequencing offers detailed genomic information to differentiate closely related species.
2. How are Results Presented?
Results are typically delivered in a comprehensive report format, which includes species annotations, phylogenetic trees, functional prediction outcomes, and various data visualizations. The report may feature statistics on sequence splits, bar charts of annotation levels, LEfSe analysis LDA bar charts, Venn diagrams, heatmaps of beta diversity indices, and species interaction networks.
3. How do I prepare my samples for submission?
Ensure that samples are properly labeled and stored according to the guidelines provided. For environmental samples, please use sterile containers and preserve samples to prevent contamination. Detailed instructions are available on our service pages.
4. Why is accurate bacterial identification essential?
Accurate bacterial identification is paramount for environmental monitoring (EM) programs within pharmaceutical and other regulated product manufacturing industries. The process of identifying unknown isolates serves as a crucial initial step in assessing the potential risks posed by microorganisms to the manufacturing environment, final product, and ultimately to patients. Effective bacterial identification services, which offer EM data tracking and trending solutions, are vital for maintaining a clear baseline understanding of a facility's microbial flora. This allows for the early detection of any unusual microbial activity, thereby providing a window of opportunity for timely remediation.
Tapping into the maize root microbiome to identify bacteria that promote growth under chilling conditions
Journal: Microbiome
Impact factor: 16.837
Published: 18 April 2020
Background
Maize faces yield issues in colder climates due to chilling temperatures. To address this, researchers investigated how chilling stress affects the maize root microbiome and identified beneficial bacteria that could enhance growth under stress. They analyzed the root microbiome using deep-sequencing technologies and screened a collection of maize endophytes for their growth-promoting effects under chilling conditions.
Materials & Methods
Sample Preparation
Sequencing
Data Analysis
Results
Two experiments identified key bacterial communities in maize root endosphere grown in field soil and pots. Both conditions showed distinct microbiomes, with Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria being predominant. Differences in abundance, notably in Actinobacteria and Oxalobacteraceae, were observed between field and pot-grown maize. The study highlights how growth conditions affect root microbiome composition.

Fig 1. Identification of the main maize root endosphere families of field-grown and pot-grown maize.
Chilling temperatures significantly alter the maize root endosphere microbiome, with over 40% of the variance attributed to temperature changes. The impact is more pronounced in the root endosphere than in the bulk soil, where specific bacterial families like Chitinophagaceae and Blastocatellaceae show notable shifts.

Fig 2. Bacterial community shifts upon chilling temperature treatment in experiments IV and V.
Conclusion
Plants establish a stable root microbiome primarily from surrounding soil, with chilling conditions causing more significant bacterial shifts in the roots than in the bulk soil. The identified PGPR strains, which thrive in the root endosphere, show promise for promoting maize growth under chilling temperatures and will be further explored for agricultural use.
Reference